I think Law of Assumption is mostly wrong…

4–6 minutes

I think this because most coaches and content creators in this community are teaching a very narrow point of view and maybe using Quantum Physics and MetaPhysics in a very liberal, loose, misunderstood and highly biassed view.

And also because all my experiments with both Law of Assumption and Law of attraction have NEVER BEEN CONSISTENT – the kind you need for empirical evidence and scientific working / reasoning. Yes occult and metaphysics is an art and science of it’s own sorts – especially the Western Esoteric and Magick Traditions which are where all new thought, religions and personal development sciences come from, not to mention the sciences that came from the Alchemical branch and root of Western Magick Traditions.

Also the argument about manifesting an SP (Specific Person) via Law of assumption can never really be resolved unless you live from an extreme constructionist viewpoint or an extreme solipsism (which is a very juvenile philosophy if you ask me) viewpoint. And listen to the preachers of law of assumption and manifesting an SP zealots, who are they trying to convince it’s not “black magic” or “voodoo” ?

Now do people reflect us and is there truth in Neville Goddard’s works and Everyone / Everything is Yourself pushed out? yes. Its Hermetic principles and laws 101 basic bitch stuff. But not the way they preach and misconstrue it on Youtube and TikTok.

Now are we manifesting and influencing each other all of the time? yes again, the same as above.

The trouble is we live in this world and age where the constructionists and post-modern zealots have the loudest voice and try to silence or cancel or cause public or social “Humiliation / Ruination” to people who disagree. Look at the modern religion of science or materialism who causes public humiliation to scholars who can prove another Alt theory or a Supernatural claim, let alone a claim of becoming religious again.

One thing that has been consistent for me in Law of assumption is affirmations are a kind of good but long winded way of reprogramming your mind, and of course magic and manifestation is change yourself to change your objective 3d world. But it’s only that.

We can only make educated and experiential claims and guesses as to how your thoughts become things, repetition is one of them. Actions and emotions are also different versions of affirmations, probably more weighty ones compared to just the silly thoughts and affirmations we’re given or use, like my SP can only get hard for me or my (married and with children) SP prioritises me and only me…. and the worst ones I’ve heard are “My SP’s 3P’s (3rd party – often a wife or long term partner) baby dies or is not my SP’s” – yes i have read / heard that in manifesting groups from very desperate people following coaches (The coaches or content producers are not pushing this or teaching it, they are comments and questions from the followings and fans – which is disturbing to say the least).

What I have shown is the extreme end not the normal or average.

It’s like these followers are afraid that people outside of themselves have free will to not like them or choose a better man or woman than them, and the followers are not the better men or women because they are being the desperate people trying to manifest someone who rejected them or wouldn’t choose or vibe with them anyway. Besides if you met a man who wooed you then you found out they were married with kids and had kind of led you up a bad lane, would you really be so disrespectful to yourself to get with that man and make them the object of a long manifesting quest? I wouldn’t. And before the LOA zealots start on me, no Everyone and everything is yourself pushed out does not mean you are solely creating your circumstances, and I know all the arguments they make on this, using quantum physics (Which most don’t really understand like with metaphysics) etc.

I speak from doing countless SP manifestation experiments and other magick and manifesting experiments. The evidence is lacking and very contradictory to what is taught, in my personal experience. No we cannot make the rules of manifesting up and our mere conditioning or assumptions from our human brain and mind are not what manifest meaning or what ever they claim.

Also that’s another thing, there’s no objective world or meaning? Meaning may be more subjective and relative, but there’s meaning to things outside of the meger meaning we give them. Nothing is meaningless as Law of assumption coaches teach or preach. They may mean that another’s once in a blue moon’s actions to you has little meaning to you as an inherent spiritual and human being. Like Failure is often given a wrong meaning and a shift in perspective gives you a higher order understanding of what failure is vs failing forward and learning from past experiences.

This is all I have to say for now, but will have more to comment on this as I explore manifesting and magick from a more western Magical tradition view point.

I am thinking of re-studying Neville Goddard’s complete reader and the Lectures I can get access to and re-studying the Bible (I was born and raised a British Anglican Christian but have since become more of a Gnostic eclectic western esoteric practitioner and experimenter and student). I want to compare what Neville and the like (in the old and true original NEW THOUGHT movement) say about manifesting and how reality works vs what the Western Magical tradition and sources say – like the King James Bible and the other Gnostic and Forbidden bibles say – on magick and manifesting; and compare to what is being taught on modern platforms and vs my own experiences and trials.

Until then, see you soon and thanks for reading.